RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] LTP system call case alarm04 Failed in xen0.

["Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>]

Does anybody know if this test passes on Xen/x86?  How
about with Xen/VTx or Xen/VTi?  I wonder
if this is related to general issues with virtual time that
any virtualized system would see (even Vmware)?

If this test passes with other virtualized systems but
not on Xen/ia64, we should definitely try to understand
why it fails.

Thanks,
Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of You, Yongkang
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:33 PM
> To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] LTP system call case alarm04 Failed in xen0.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I am now doing some testing on xen0 with LTP (Linux test project).
> 
> I used the xen-ia64-unstable tree 8476. My CPU is Intel 
> Montecito. My native and service OS Linux is RHEL4u2.The LTP 
> which I used is the one of 2005-12-5.
> 
> I have run the system call cases. Basically the testing 
> result is good. There is only 1 case "alarm04" failed. This 
> case can pass in the native Linux. 
> 
> The testing log show:
> sig_reg 1 FAIL : alarm() fails to send SIGALRM to execede process
> 
> The latest LTP can be downloaded from 
> http://ltp.sourceforge.net/ . Alarm04 code didn't change in 
> the latest LTP changeset.
> 
> Could somebody help to look at this issue? If need more 
> information, please Let me know. I will send out other LTP 
> failed issues here for you hunter bugs in the future.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel