|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] "-Wall" option doesn't work
To: |
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] "-Wall" option doesn't work |
From: |
"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:08:33 +0800 |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:15:30 +0000 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcYXU5eMGx7WqdX2S+aQmZrCTZUJTQAAFOIgAABuebA= |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-ia64-devel] "-Wall" option doesn't work |
Hi Anthony,
I am also working on this issue now. Fixing these warnings as Tristan said is
very boring indeed. Since Tristan have made the patch for it, and I won't spend
more time on this again. OK? :)
Zhang Xiantao
CSD-OTC PRC Virtualization
Intel (China) Limited
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tian, Kevin
Sent: 2006年1月12日 16:45
To: Tristan Gingold; Xu, Anthony; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] "-Wall" option doesn't work
>From: Tristan Gingold
>Sent: 2006年1月12日 17:37
>I have already sent two patches enabling warnings.
>
>The first one was very big (140KB) and Dan rejected it almost for this reason.
>
>The second one was rather small (4KB) and fixed the most boring warnings (the
>most obvious and those in .h files which appear in every file). It was not
>accepted (without explaination).
>
>I am not sure Dan is interested in warnings.
Hi, Tristan,
I think above patches to fix warning are very important and always
welcomed for stability. Maybe Dan was in busy with other more important threads
at time you sent out them. Could you re-send them out?
>
>For sure, fixing warnings is *very* boring. Some are in fact bugs: function
>called with less arguments, very dubious casts...
>I really think warnings must be enabled and the earlier is the better.
>
>Tristan.
Absolutely agree.
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
|
|
|
|