|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年1月4日 23:34
>
>Le Mercredi 04 Janvier 2006 13:26, Tian, Kevin a écrit :
>> Hi, Dan,
>> Attached is another important Xen/ia64 fix to enable domU/vbd
>> working on system with >1G hole in dom0's memory layout. Once memmap of
>> dom0 is virtualized, there's no way for dom0 to access machine frames
>> (like from domU) which is outside of EFI memory layout known by dom0,
>> because of no mapping. So we have to disable CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP
>> explicitly, to ensure dom0 constructing a physical memmap array.
>[...]
>Hmm, this side effect is very interesting.
>
>If Xen requires virtual_mem_map, then dom0 will require it too.
>Since dom0 can't work yet with virtual_mem_map, enabling it in Xen is moot,
>isn't it ?
>
>Tristan.
Seems like that. If we add phys2mach (p!=m) concept into dom0, that's not the
issue then. ;-)
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix,
Tian, Kevin <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
|
|
|
|
|