RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable

["Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ha, yes. At least I see a new extra page required now for xen console, just 
like previous xenstore page. You may need to sync xen-ia64-unstable.hg first 
and I will take a look. (Maybe same thing needs for xenlinux-ia64?)

Thanks,
Kevin



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>Sent: 2005年9月9日 5:17
>To: Tian, Kevin; Byrne, John (HP Labs)
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable
>
>> >> BTW, I'll send out the tools change
>> >> to xen mailing list, since some common code is changed upon ia64.
>> >
>> >Yes, it will be interesting to see if it gets in.  I hope it
>> >does, but in the past Keir has been resistant to ifdef code.
>> >
>> >Please keep track of it and let us all know if it gets in!
>>
>> Yes, too many ifdefs are unacceptable. If the news is bad, we
>> have to find other way, like trying to catch up with x86
>> behavior closely to reduce such branches. ;-(
>
>Per Keir's response/permission, we can put the patch into
>xen-ia64-unstable and he will pull it in the next update.
>
>First, however, it appears that we are behind again... I tried
>applying the patch against xen-unstable tip and the patch
>applied only with many hunk offsets.  The result didn't
>compile (though probably not due to this specific patch).
>
>Dan

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel