RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen is now runnnig at Bull

["Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>]

>How can I know I reverted to 6464 ?

Hg diff -r 6464
If there is no output, you have reverted to 6464.

Thanks
Anthony


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2005年9月8日 17:25
>To: Tian, Kevin; Xu, Anthony; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen is now runnnig at Bull
>
>Le Jeudi 08 Septembre 2005 03:21, Tian, Kevin a écrit :
>> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
>>
>> >What is the hg command to know the changeset ?  I used 'hg revert xxx'
>> and
>> >'hg log' still displays the 'hg pull' changeset.
>> Hg history: show all the changesets
>> Hg heads: show current head of the hg tree
>Neither seems ok for me.
>I tried:
>
>$ hg clone xen-ia64-unstable-Intel.hg try-intel
>$ cd try-intel/
>$ hg log | head -40
>changeset:   6466:bbca8e1b94e319cfc1868ca10b5a8a50128fb9d9
>tag:         tip
>user:        fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>date:        Sun Sep  4 22:04:56 2005
>summary:     Put Elilo patch and readme into xen/arch/ia64/tools/elilo
>
>
>changeset:   6465:915bcdfafe7f57f68cf98aabaf876464ac0f1807
>user:        fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>date:        Sun Sep  4 21:52:53 2005
>summary:     merge elilo module support from Rev6461 baesd diff to Rev6464
>
>$ hg revert -r 6464
>$ hg heads | head
>changeset:   6466:bbca8e1b94e319cfc1868ca10b5a8a50128fb9d9
>tag:         tip
>user:        fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>date:        Sun Sep  4 22:04:56 2005
>summary:     Put Elilo patch and readme into xen/arch/ia64/tools/elilo
>
>$ hg history | head
>changeset:   6466:bbca8e1b94e319cfc1868ca10b5a8a50128fb9d9
>tag:         tip
>user:        fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>date:        Sun Sep  4 22:04:56 2005
>summary:     Put Elilo patch and readme into xen/arch/ia64/tools/elilo
>
>
>changeset:   6465:915bcdfafe7f57f68cf98aabaf876464ac0f1807
>user:        fred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>date:        Sun Sep  4 21:52:53 2005
>
>How can I know I reverted to 6464 ?
>
>
>[...]
>> I think normally elilo will place parameters, initrd, etc. in higher end
>> of physical memory, and it's unlikely to map all memories by one TR.
>Correct.
>> Actually the alt dtlb miss fault is wanted for Xen to access all the
>> physical memories.
>Correct.
>> BTW, can you check whether 0x617ef90010 is legal
>> address in a memory bank on your box?
>Yes it is (I checked with the ITP).
>
>Thanks.
>Tristan.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel