|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge
Dan:
Thanks, we will send out a patch soon for review with 1: guest
ITC (delta) /ITM keep in shared page, 2: fast hypercall for TPR,EOI,
IVR, 3: ac_timer own machine ITM, 4: short route for guest to set ITM.
Eddie.
>
> So Xen/x86 delivers every timer tick to every Linux domain?
> That seems like a potential performance problem!
Yes, the overhead spent on IA32 timer is much higher than IA64.
Perhaps Linux tickless patch is a better solution.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Dong, Eddie
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge,
Dong, Eddie <=
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer merge, Dong, Eddie
|
|
|
|
|