[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [Patch] Fix IDLE issue with

To:	"Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [Patch] Fix IDLE issue with sedf scheduler on IA64
From:	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:07:52 +0800
Cc:	xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2005 02:06:36 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	DIscussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcWHkNam4njROoPTSRq2Lw7NMoU4SwAE6cuAAAJhJYAAA5hiwAAW6AAg
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] RE: [Patch] Fix IDLE issue with sedf scheduler on IA64

>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>[mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:09 PM
>
>I think domain0 only goes in the waitq at one point -- when
>it calls pal_halt_light to idle its virtual machine.  This
>case could be easily changed (there is already some code there)
>to ensure domain0 is always runnable.
>
>Dan

As I said in another mail, too many pal_halt_light in Dom0's idle loop
is even worse than current IDLE domain. (At lease unmodified dom0 can't
change that behavior)

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [Patch] Fix IDLE issue with sedf sc