|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Xen-devel] Please pull latest xen-ia64.bkbits (CON
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>[mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 11:52 PM
>
>Argh, I had test-compiled CONFIG_VTI with these but had neglected
>to "bk new" them. (Apparently "bk patch" doesn't automatically
>do a new.)
>
>They are now pushed to xen-ia64.bkbits and it doesn't appear
>that Keir has pulled any of the changesets into xen.bkbits yet.
>
>Sorry, I'll try to be more careful in the future.
Thanks, and I'll also include a brief line about new files in patch
later, to save your time for filtering which files should be "bk new"
specifically.
>
>Note also that I've pushed an evtchn fix from Matt and your
>get_page_type/etc patch. I don't think either of those impact
>CONFIG_VTI yet though.
>
Yes, CONFIG_VTI still works, but with potential impact. :)
Since #ifdef CONFIG_VTI is used in put_page, you may also want
to use same format in get_page, instead of #ifdef 0. Or else put_page
and get_page are unsymmetrical on refcnt when CONFIG_VTI is enabled.
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
|
|
|
|