| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 06/13] libxl: permit declaration after sta
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 12:36 -0400, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 06/13] libxl: permit
> > declaration after statement"):
> > > I suspect there isn't much scope for abuse of this capability but would
> > > a few words of guidance in CODING_STYLE make sense?
> >
> > I don't think there's anything I feel needs saying. If you think
> > people are likely to abuse it in a particular way then do say :-).
> >
> > Otherwise we can wait and see what results and add stuff to
> > CODING_STYLE as necessary ?
>
> Yes, lets do that.
>
I think it would make sense to add to the CODING_STYLE that variable
declarations shouldn't be mixed with code, unless part of a macro or an
alloca-like construct.
Basically the coding style should stay the same that is now.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home