WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu

To: "dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:57:14 +0900
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:59:33 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4EAFD891.8000204@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <20111031214036.GG12984@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4EAFD891.8000204@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 07:31 -0400, Mark Dokter wrote:
> In that test, the KVM machine uses virtio disk and nic devices, while
> the Xen machine uses the qemu emulated devices. Could that be the cause
> for the poor performance?

Very much so. Without using the PVHVM drivers in the Xen case this is
very much an apples to oranges comparison.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel