| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 5/5] kvm guest : pv-ticketlocks support fo
|
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 5/5] kvm guest : pv-ticketlocks support for linux guests running on KVM hypervisor |
|
From: |
Raghavendra K T <raghukt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:55:55 +0530 |
|
Cc: |
"x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:04:41 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<4EA7017B.5000903@xxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<20111023190307.16364.35381.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111023190753.16364.31164.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4EA7017B.5000903@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110928 Fedora/3.1.15-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.15 |
On 10/26/2011 12:05 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 10/23/2011 12:07 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_DEBUG_FS
+
+#include<linux/debugfs.h>
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_DEBUG_FS */
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS */
This is a big mess. Is there any problem with including linux/debugfs.h
unconditionally? Or at least using "#if
defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)&& defined(CONFIG_KVM_DEBUG_FS)"?
I agree. I 'll include unconditionally unless somebody objects.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home