xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] kvm hypervisor : Add two hypercalls t
To: |
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] kvm hypervisor : Add two hypercalls to support pv-ticketlock |
From: |
Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:14:21 +0200 |
Cc: |
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:53:48 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20111023190558.16364.2136.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<20111023190307.16364.35381.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111023190558.16364.2136.sendpatchset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/7.0.1 |
On 10/23/2011 09:05 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> Add two hypercalls to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks.
>
> KVM_HC_WAIT_FOR_KICK blocks the calling vcpu until another vcpu kicks it or it
> is woken up because of an event like interrupt.
>
> KVM_HC_KICK_CPU allows the calling vcpu to kick another vcpu.
>
> The presence of these hypercalls is indicated to guest via
> KVM_FEATURE_WAIT_FOR_KICK/KVM_CAP_WAIT_FOR_KICK.
>
> Qemu needs a corresponding patch to pass up the presence of this feature to
> guest via cpuid. Patch to qemu will be sent separately.
>
> There is no Xen/KVM hypercall interface to await kick from.
>
>
> +/*
> + * kvm_pv_wait_for_kick_op : Block until kicked by either a KVM_HC_KICK_CPU
> + * hypercall or a event like interrupt.
> + *
> + * @vcpu : vcpu which is blocking.
> + */
> +static void kvm_pv_wait_for_kick_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +
> + /*
> + * Blocking on vcpu->wq allows us to wake up sooner if required to
> + * service pending events (like interrupts).
> + *
> + * Also set state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before checking vcpu->kicked to
> + * avoid racing with kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op().
> + */
> + prepare_to_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +
> + /*
> + * Somebody has already tried kicking us. Acknowledge that
> + * and terminate the wait.
> + */
> + if (vcpu->kicked) {
> + vcpu->kicked = 0;
> + goto end_wait;
> + }
> +
> + /* Let's wait for either KVM_HC_KICK_CPU or someother event
> + * to wake us up.
> + */
> +
> + srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> + schedule();
> + vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
> +
> +end_wait:
> + finish_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
> +}
This hypercall can be replaced by a HLT instruction, no?
I'm pretty sure this misses a lot of stuff from kvm_vcpu_block().
> +
> +/*
> + * kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op: Kick a vcpu.
> + *
> + * @cpu - vcpu to be kicked.
> + */
> +static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, int cpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpu);
> +
Is the vcpu number meaningful? We should reuse an existing identifier
like the APIC ID.
> + if (vcpu) {
> + vcpu->kicked = 1;
Need to use smp memory barriers here.
> + wake_up_interruptible(&vcpu->wq);
> + }
> +}
> +
> int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret;
>
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|