WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V5 00/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V5 00/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:12:47 -0700
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:13:55 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E988929.8040801@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <cover.1318466916.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> <1318503245.24856.12.camel@twins> <4E971580.6030300@xxxxxxxx> <20111014141701.GA2433@xxxxxxxxxx> <4E986B2B.60803@xxxxxxxx> <4E98815F.6080105@xxxxxxxxx> <4E988929.8040801@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0
On 10/14/2011 12:10 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> We probably don't want all those implementations (near) inline, so they
> would end up being plain function calls anyway.
> 

I would not object if the native one was closer, though; especially in
term of source text (the current level of macroization of some
operations is horrific.)

        -hpa



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel