|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] shared_cpu_map member never initialized but possibly used
Mark,
in c/s 20361:51b031b0737e you removed the only place where this
member got initialized, yet the powernow driver does actually read that
field (at least theoretically). Assuming only RevF processors actually
used sharing, shouldn't the code reading the field and the field itself be
deleted (amending said c/s)?
Thanks, Jan
--- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c
@@ -199,17 +199,7 @@ static int powernow_cpufreq_cpu_init(str
perf = data->acpi_data;
policy->shared_type = perf->shared_type;
-
- /*
- * Will let policy->cpus know about dependency only when software
- * coordination is required.
- */
- if (policy->shared_type == CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL ||
- policy->shared_type == CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY) {
- policy->cpus = perf->shared_cpu_map;
- } else {
- policy->cpus = cpumask_of_cpu(cpu);
- }
+ cpumask_copy(&policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));
/* capability check */
if (perf->state_count <= 1) {
--- a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
+++ b/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ struct processor_performance {
uint32_t state_count;
struct xen_processor_px *states;
struct xen_psd_package domain_info;
- cpumask_t shared_cpu_map;
uint32_t shared_type;
uint32_t init;
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] shared_cpu_map member never initialized but possibly used,
Jan Beulich <=
|
|
|
|
|