 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: don't use xmalloc_array() for allocation
| To: | Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: don't use xmalloc_array() for allocation of the (per-CPU) IDTs |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:15:41 +0100 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:17:07 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gBQODl8f/SseloixiIqrbrIAkvlcaI4zzKmPljnhJ2U=; b=mZZWJK4fHwcZ+iVieIQ72y/nsHCgaRdBoLhx0rUdd2mN3sYGuROXc7enQH0t3oo8hy DlTTRTHHdcV/ZUK4FQf4T6ZaBNVtTc3Z9FNrWihfsAYq6cJqdbLyVDx3gCRLE67VGUXn A9ubmvlYkh7C5Z1IW3UzAfxRKl1NQJ6hpnRVk= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4E96B593020000780005B0CE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcyJgEvzwfjejcjH2Ea+70ftE5uFBw== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: don't use xmalloc_array() for allocation of the (per-CPU) IDTs |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427 |
On 13/10/2011 08:55, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 13.10.11 at 09:50, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Finally, I'm not sure about more x86-64 code movement: I'd like to kill >> x86-32 entirely really. > > I know, but you got pushed back each time you tried... I think we're stuck with it for 4.2. Will try again when we open development for 4.3. The argument last time was the low-powered Atoms, used in low-end netbooks; but there's no evidence that anyone is using Xen on such platforms. I can't imagine it would be very worthwhile. -- Keir > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] interface: Flesh out the BLKIF_OP_DISCARD description, Ian Campbell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VMX: extend last branch MSR info to cover newer CPU models, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: don't use xmalloc_array() for allocation of the (per-CPU) IDTs, Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: don't use xmalloc_array() for allocation of the (per-CPU) IDTs, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
