WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] XEN increases idle power consumption by 25%

To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] XEN increases idle power consumption by 25%
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:59:13 +0100
Cc: Martin Meier <martin4meier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:33 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E5551ED.9090704@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CADgo_mFhqo7iiyGGuJn5QDu_sEmUnQfxQwm5cqm2FsLGLRXvJg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E5518EF0200007800052EC6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E5551ED.9090704@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On 24.08.11 at 21:33, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 06:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 24.08.11 at 14:03, Martin Meier <martin4meier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a change in AC idle power consumption from ~23W to ~29W
>>> when changing form 3.1-rc2 to 3.1-rc2 on top of xen-4.2-unstable  with no
>>> domUs running.
>>>
>>> It seems that the CPU never gets into the low power idle state for the whole
>>> CPU-package 'PC6'
>>> and the Vcore voltage never gets below +1.06 V (It get down to 0.7V w/o
>>> xen).
>> This has been discussed recently; see e.g. the thread starting at
>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-08/msg00511.html.
> 
> Also, upstream Linux doesn't have the patches to pass the power state
> stuff through to Xen, which I guess it part of it?

Oh yes, of course.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel