WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Network dies and kernel errors

On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 05:01:38PM +0800, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
> 
> in my test environment, the irqbalance is already stopped.
>  
> So my bnx bug may not related  to this.


Did you use 'noirqbalance' on the Xen hypervisor line?
>  
> Many thanks.
>  
> 
> > Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 12:17:36 -0400
> > From: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To: johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > CC: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Network dies and kernel errors
> > 
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 06:21:47PM -0500, John McMonagle wrote:
> > > Konrad
> > > 
> > > I ran as you requested and after 2 days it's still up.
> > 
> > Good!
> > > 
> > > Attached are xen.dmesg and dom0.dmesg all the command line parameters are 
> > > in 
> > > them. 
> > 
> > > At this point I'd be happy if was on line with a reasonably efficient 
> > > stable 
> > > configuration.
> > 
> > So it looks like from your runs (before you had irqbalance):
> > 
> > (XEN) MSI 31 vec=ad fixed edge assert phys cpu dest=00000023 mask=1/0/0
> > (XEN) MSI 31 vec=ad fixed edge assert phys cpu dest=00000023 mask=1/0/0
> > (XEN) MSI 31 vec=ad fixed edge assert phys cpu dest=00000023 mask=1/0/0
> > (XEN) MSI 31 vec=ad fixed edge assert phys cpu dest=00000023 mask=1/0/0
> > (XEN) IRQ: 31 affinity:00000000,00000000,00000000,00004000 vec:b5 
> > type=PCI-MSI status=00000010 in-flight=0 domain-list=0:273(----),
> > (XEN) MSI 31 vec=39 fixed edge assert phys cpu dest=00000020 mask=1/0/0
> > (XEN) IRQ: 31 affinity:00000000,00000000,00000000,00000100 vec:39 
> > type=PCI-MSI status=00000050 in-flight=0 domain-list=0:273(----),
> > 
> > The affinity (and the corresponding vector) moves from one CPU to another
> > and then dom0 somehow does not get it. Do you have another of these
> > boxes available remotly to debug this further?
> > 
>                                         

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>