Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IOMMU faults

[Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 14:32 +0100 on 24 Jun (1308925934), Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 11:28 +0100 on 16 Jun (1308223697), Jean Guyader wrote:
> > > Of course, even with this patch, my original question still stands:
> > > should Xen do something more assertive in the IOMMU fault handler?
> > 
> > What we really want to achive here is to stop DMA on this device.
> > One way of doing it is to perform a proper PCI reset (FLR, secondary
> > bus reset, ...) when that happens.
> 
> I think that's more or less a consensus then, that we should try to
> stop the device from the IOMMU fault handler.
> 
> Looking at your patch in a bit more detail, I see two things that worry
> me.  The first is that the new pci_reset_device() function does nothing
> at all if the device isn't one of the particular graphics cards it know
> about!
> 
> The second is this comment: 
> 
> > +    /* Leave CMD MEMORY set otherwise the platform can crashe during FLR */
> > +    pci_conf_write16(bus, d, f, PCI_COMMAND, 2);
> 
> which implies that my current approach of just disabling the card might
> have pretty bad conequences.  Can you expand on that?  Would it be
> better just to mask out PCI_COMMAND_MASTER?  And if I do that do I need
> to try and issue a reset as well (i.e. are there cards that are known to
> ignore this bit?)

Ping?

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel