|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
AW: Re: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?
>b). If you just want to use the later version of a kernel for DomU, you
don't
>need the xen pciback. You need the xen pcifront - which has some
bug-fixes in 2.6.39.
I started with this one. First observation: seems to generate high load
(~20% in xentop, as opposed
to ~10% with the Xenified kernel).
Xen 4.1.1 with stable/2.6.39.x from Konrad xen.git.
Also a WARNING came up during boot, but everything works. But I thought
you would eventually be able to
read something from it:
[ 2.850254] WARNING: at kernel/irq/handle.c:130
handle_irq_event_percpu+0xa0/0x15f()
[ 2.850274] irq 28 handler interrupt_hw+0x0/0x1b7 [saa7146] enabled
interrupts
[ 2.850288] Modules linked in: budget_ci(+) b2c2_flexcop(+)
ir_rc5_decoder budget_core dvb_core ir_nec_decoder snd_pcm cx24123
saa7146 snd_timer cx24113 snd ttpci_eeprom s5h1420 soundcore rc_core
snd_page_alloc i2c_core pcspkr ext3 jbd mbcache xen_netfront
xen_blkfront
[ 2.850374] Pid: 141, comm: udevd Not tainted 2.6.39.2-xen-686 #4
[ 2.850384] Call Trace:
[ 2.850398] [<c10361e8>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x6a/0x7b
[ 2.850411] [<c107536b>] ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0xa0/0x15f
[ 2.850424] [<c103625f>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x28/0x2c
[ 2.850437] [<c107536b>] ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0xa0/0x15f
[ 2.850451] [<d51cfe32>] ? SAA7146_IER_DISABLE+0x36/0x36 [saa7146]
[ 2.850465] [<c107544b>] ? handle_irq_event+0x21/0x37
[ 2.850478] [<c1076d36>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x66/0x7e
[ 2.850492] [<c11a8515>] ? __xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x129/0x1b0
[ 2.850506] [<c11a913b>] ? xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x18/0x26
[ 2.850519] [<c12aea97>] ? xen_do_upcall+0x7/0xc
[ 2.850532] [<c114b407>] ? strcmp+0x8/0x19
[ 2.850545] [<c1104287>] ? sysfs_dentry_revalidate+0x38/0x88
[ 2.850559] [<c10ca1d1>] ? walk_component+0x18c/0x2b4
[ 2.850571] [<c1103437>] ? sysfs_permission+0x49/0x4f
[ 2.850583] [<c10ca96a>] ? link_path_walk+0x14f/0x38a
[ 2.850597] [<c1113e66>] ? security_file_alloc+0xc/0xd
[ 2.850610] [<c10cb9db>] ? path_openat+0x7f/0x27d
[ 2.850623] [<c10cbc7d>] ? do_filp_open+0x21/0x60
[ 2.850635] [<c10bdc68>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x21/0xd9
[ 2.850647] [<c10c921e>] ? getname_flags+0x20/0xbd
[ 2.850660] [<c10c04f4>] ? do_sys_open+0x58/0xd1
[ 2.850672] [<c10c05b1>] ? sys_open+0x1e/0x23
[ 2.850684] [<c12a901c>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[ 2.850694] ---[ end trace 5b96651124c9fbda ]---
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Carsten Schiers
- Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Sander Eikelenboom
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Carsten Schiers
- Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Sander Eikelenboom
- AW: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Carsten Schiers
- AW: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Carsten Schiers
- Re: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- AW: Re: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?,
Carsten Schiers <=
- AW: Re: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Carsten Schiers
- Re: Re: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- AW: Re: Re: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Carsten Schiers
- Re: Re: Re: Re: AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Carsten Schiers
AW: Re: [Xen-devel] AW: Load increase after memory upgrade?, Carsten Schiers
|
|
|
|
|