|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen/blkback: Don't let in-flight requests de
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:42:28AM -0700, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 10:03 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > In the case at hand, increasing the ring size was way more productive.
> > > At which point the queue depth multiplies as well. And I currently
> > > expect that the longer it gets the more urgent the issue you describe
> > > will be.
> >
> > You wouldn't have patches for that somewhere tucked away? I am going over
> > the patches for 3.1 xen-blkback and was thinking to have them all queued up
> > and
> > test them all at once..
>
> I was going to send the kernel patch right after, just to discover that
> xen-blkback lacks some of the synchronization items the original one was
> based on. It's coming, but it's rather going to be a series.
That is fine. Please also CC lkml when posting the series. Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|