Wednesday, June 22, 2011, 4:00:22 PM, you wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:02:29PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>
>> Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 7:05:25 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:11:42PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> >> Hello Konrad,
>> >>
>> >> Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 4:13:55 PM, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> >> >> Hi Konrad,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm trying to use a kernel compiled from your devel/next-3.0 branch.
>> >>
>> >> > Ok, good.
>> >> >> But trying to start a PV guest with pci-passthrough makes xen complain:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> xm create /etc/xen/domU/production/security.cfg
>> >> >> Using config file "/etc/xen/domU/production/security.cfg".
>> >> >> Error: pci: PCI Backend and pci-stub don't own device 0000:04:00.0
>> >>
>> >> Ah it seems to be the sysfs indeed, in
>> >> module name: xen_pciback
>> >> driver: xen-pciback
>>
>> > This is above (and the sysfs below) is 2.6.39 based and it worked?
>> >>
>> >> in 3.0 the
>> >> module name: xen_pciback
>> >> driver: pciback
>> >>
>> >> Quite a mix of names, and different use of minus and underscore.
>>
>> > Hmm, you are a right. I somehow I thought I backed up the patch that
>> > used the wrong name (well, not wrong but just incorrect).
>>
>> So if I understand you correct you will revert the driver name from
>> xen-pciback to pciback, so no xen change is needed ?
> So this patch:
> f3fc28d52f42220bcce8c2fed12aef2a88c9fadc
> xen/pciback: revert the name of the PCI driver to 'pciback'.
> should have done the trick but I am not seeing it in the
> devel/xen-pciback-0.6.. Aha! I forgot to push the branch up to git.kernel.org.
> Before I do that, can you cherry-pick that one please and tell
> me if it works? If it does I will stick 'Reported-by' and 'Tested-by'
> on the patch if you are OK with that.
And were exactly do i cherry pick that from ? :-) since you say you haven't
pushed it :p
If you can attach the patch i will test it right away, sticking the reported
and tested-by is fine !
--
Sander
--
Best regards,
Sander mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home