There's no need for using the ..._safe() list iterators when deletion
of objects is followed by a loop exit.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulcih <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- a/drivers/xen/netback/accel.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/netback/accel.c
@@ -208,10 +208,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netback_connect_accele
*/
void netback_disconnect_accelerator(int id, const char *eth_name)
{
- struct netback_accelerator *accelerator, *next;
+ struct netback_accelerator *accelerator;
mutex_lock(&accelerators_mutex);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(accelerator, next, &accelerators_list, link) {
+ list_for_each_entry(accelerator, &accelerators_list, link) {
if (!strcmp(eth_name, accelerator->eth_name)) {
xenbus_for_each_backend
(accelerator,
netback_accelerator_remove_backend);
--- a/drivers/xen/pciback/vpci.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/pciback/vpci.c
@@ -146,9 +146,9 @@ void pciback_release_pci_dev(struct pcib
spin_lock_irqsave(&vpci_dev->lock, flags);
for (slot = 0; slot < PCI_SLOT_MAX; slot++) {
- struct pci_dev_entry *e, *tmp;
- list_for_each_entry_safe(e, tmp, &vpci_dev->dev_list[slot],
- list) {
+ struct pci_dev_entry *e;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(e, &vpci_dev->dev_list[slot], list) {
if (e->dev == dev) {
list_del(&e->list);
found_dev = e->dev;
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev.c
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static ssize_t xenbus_dev_write(struct f
void *reply = NULL;
LIST_HEAD(queue);
char *path, *token;
- struct watch_adapter *watch, *tmp_watch;
+ struct watch_adapter *watch;
int err, rc = len;
if (!is_xenstored_ready())
@@ -289,8 +289,7 @@ static ssize_t xenbus_dev_write(struct f
list_add(&watch->list, &u->watches);
} else {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(watch, tmp_watch,
- &u->watches, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(watch, &u->watches, list) {
if (!strcmp(watch->token, token) &&
!strcmp(watch->watch.node, path))
{
xen-list-no-safe.patch
Description: Text document
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|