|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: vsyscalls may be going away... impact on Xen time perfor
On 06/09/2011 02:55 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Hmmm...
>
> It appears that Xen time mechanisms that use vsyscall may be
> getting slower...
>
> "This is a significant performance penalty (~220ns here) for
> all vsyscall users, but there aren't many left."
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/446220/
>
> I honestly don't remember all the details myself anymore,
> but I think this means that user apps in Xen PV domains
> that call gettimeofday a *lot* may be in for a bit of
> a shock when they move to a 3.x kernel in the future.
> (Many enterprise apps do things like timestamp transactions,
> which can lead to 10s of thousands of gettimeofday's
> per second.)
He's talking about vsyscall, but not vdso. vsyscall mechanism is the
old one where kernel-provided code was mapped into userspace at fixed
addresses which were part of the ABI. Its only used by very old
versions of glibc.
The newer vdso mechanism provides a full shared object, which contains
symbols for the entrypoints so they don't need to be a fixed addresses
any more.
They're functionally equivalent, so there's no loss of performance from
dropping vsyscalls.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|