|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
AW: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] xl: improve compatibility with xm
Sorry folks, I tried to resent, but then, I saw that I was only in CC of
the mail, so
I did not do anything wrong ?!? BR, C.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2011 18:46
An: Ian Jackson
Cc: Ian Campbell; xen-devel; Carsten Schiers; Stefano Stabellini
Betreff: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] xl: improve compatibility with
xm
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Carsten Schiers writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] xl: improve
compatibility with xm"):
> > - printf("\t(domain_build_info)\n");
> > + printf("\t(build_info)\n");
> ...
> > printf("\t\t\t(backend_domid %d)\n",
> > d_config->disks[i].backend_domid);
>
> This patch has been wordwrapped by your mailer. Can you please
> arrange for it not to be ?
see Documentation/email-clients.txt under the Linux tree
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|