WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: fix reloc.S generation

To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: fix reloc.S generation
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:29:09 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:29:59 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201103311223.29863.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Newsgroups: chiark.mail.xen.devel
References: <201103311223.29863.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Christoph Egger writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: fix reloc.S generation"):
> attached patch fixes generation of reloc.S and makes
> xen boot out-of-the box since c/s 19146.
> The output of AT&T UNIX and GNU od(1) are different.

Which (if any) of these versions of od is correct ?  The SuSv3
specification of od is quite comprehensive so it should be possible to
contrive a rune which doesn't need subsequent seddery.  Could you try
to do so ?

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>