|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5 of 5] xentrace: use consistent printk prefix
>>> On 23.03.11 at 15:47, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd prefer something a tiny bit more descriptive, like "xentrace:", but
> I would acquiesce to xtb if someone felt strongly about it.
I was nagging just because "Xen trace buffers: " seemed overly long
to me. I'm fine with your preference.
Jan
> -George
>
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 11:18 +0000, Olaf Hering wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> > >>> On 22.03.11 at 20:21, Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > # HG changeset patch
>> > > # User Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > # Date 1300813820 -3600
>> > > # Node ID dcbae547cce81f10c243d54bd35fd139615313cb
>> > > # Parent e58f6949e76a2786c4f5a99a0da44ee58743b4df
>> > > xentrace: use consistent printk prefix
>> >
>> > Why "Xen trace buffers: " and not e.g. "xtb: "?
>>
>> Its used in other printk calls already.
>> George, would a change to xtb: be ok for you for all existing printk calls?
>>
>> Olaf
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|