On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:54:38AM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote:
> > I believe it is already in the Greg KH 2.6.37.x bug-fix branch. But ... we
> > don't actually
> > have a 2.6.37.x development branch. We do have a 2.6.38 one - wherein the
> > patch is present.
>
> I thought xen/next-2.6.37 branch under
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy.xen.git is the 2.6.37
> development branch.
We thought about it, but then 2.6.38 has so many neat stuff in it that it just
seems easier to do it
on top of 2.6.38.
>
> Is xen/next-2.6.38 under
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy.xen.git the development
> branch for 2.6.38?
>
> Base on the attached email from you, that too also has missing bug fixes. It
> sounds the best pvops tree to use is:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git
> devel/next-2.6.38
Or better, use git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git
#master
(as it is the "stable" version). The devel/next-2.6.38 is a kitchensink right
now.
>
> I will give this a try.
Thank you!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 11:36 AM
> To: Kay, Allen M; Jeremy Fitzhardinge
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Keir Fraser; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: dom0/xen boot problem
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:22:24AM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote:
> > Jeremy/Konrad,
> >
> > Thanks for Stefano's help, dom0/xen boot failure on my Sandybridge desktop
> > SDP has been isolated to the following patch that is missing in both 2.6.32
> > and 2.6.37 PVOPS branches. According to PVOPS wiki 2.6.32 and 2.6.37 are
> > suppose to be active branches. Can you back port this patch to both 2.6.32
> > and 2.6.37 branches?
>
> I believe it is already in the Greg KH 2.6.37.x bug-fix branch. But ... we
> don't actually
> have a 2.6.37.x development branch. We do have a 2.6.38 one - wherein the
> patch is present.
>
>
> Under 2.6.32.x.. Jeremy, I've stuck this patch and another in
> for-2.6.32/bug-fixes. Could you pull it please?
>
> >
> > I'm surprised that I'm the only person encountering this problem. Not
> > being able use either printk or xen_raw_printk in
> > xen_build_dynamic_phys_to_machine() does not help debugging either. I was
> > going to save max_pfn in a global variable and then print it out later in
> > xen_build_mfn_list_list() before Stefano pointed out this patch. :-)
>
> Oh man, what a headache.
> >
> > Allen
> >
> > ----- missing patch -------
> >
> > commit cf04d120d9413de581437cf9a29f138ec1178f65
> > Author: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu Jan 27 10:03:14 2011 -0500
> >
> > xen/p2m: Mark INVALID_P2M_ENTRY the mfn_list past max_pfn.
> >
> > In case the mfn_list does not have enough entries to fill
> > a p2m page we do not want the entries from max_pfn up to
> > the boundary to be filled with unknown values. Hence
> > set them to INVALID_P2M_ENTRY.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ----- active pvops branches from pvops wiki page -----
> >
> > Current active branches are:
> >
> > xen/stable-2.6.32.x - this is the long term maintained branch, tracking
> > upstream kernel.org 2.6.32.x stable updates. This branch has Xen dom0
> > patches added. This is the recommended branch for most users. Changelog:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=xen/stable-2.6.32.x
> > .
> > xen/next-2.6.32 - This is a branch for next 2.6.32 version and gets
> > migrated to the stable branch once automatic tests have succeeded.
> > Changelog:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=xen/next-2.6.32
> > .
> > xen/next-2.6.37 - this is the current development branch based on Linux
> > 2.6.37. Changelog:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=xen/next-2.6.37
> > .
Received: from rrsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.31.1.130) by
orsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:48:44 -0800
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com (10.253.24.26) by
RRSMSX606-1.rr.intel.com (10.31.1.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
8.2.254.0; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:48:43 -0700
Received: from fmsmga101.fm.intel.com ([10.1.193.65]) by
fmsmga002-1.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2011 07:48:43 -0800
Received: from lists.colo.xensource.com (HELO lists.xensource.com)
([70.42.241.110]) by mga01.intel.com with ESMTP;
24 Feb 2011 07:48:43 -0800
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by
lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsdQo-0007ZF-My;
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:48:42 -0800
Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com
with
esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsdQN-0007SR-9k for
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:48:15 -0800
Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com (rcsinet10.oracle.com [148.87.113.121]) by
spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id n0VgWBd8ink2WV4I (version=TLSv1
cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:48:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcsinet13.oracle.com (rcsinet13.oracle.com [148.87.113.125])
by
rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP
id p1OFm9d4027739
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:48:11 GMT
Received: from acsmt355.oracle.com (acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155])
by
rcsinet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id
p1OFm8ip020467; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:48:08 GMT
Received: from abhmt015.oracle.com by acsmt353.oracle.com with ESMTP id
1083839291298562413; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:46:53 -0800
Received: from phenom (/209.6.55.207) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)
with ESMTP ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:46:53 -0800
Received: by phenom (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94C46445B; Thu, 24 Feb 2011
10:46:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Rafal Wojtczuk <rafal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: "xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:46:52 -0800
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] tip of jeremy/xen.git xen/next-2.6.38 fails to compile
Thread-Topic: [Xen-devel] tip of jeremy/xen.git xen/next-2.6.38 fails to
compile
Thread-Index: AcvUOlEJ5+J/nqwTSACVDrVlT4pwRA==
Message-ID: <20110224154652.GB6893@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20110224120056.GC2221@email>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
<mailto:xen-devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
<mailto:xen-devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
In-Reply-To: <20110224120056.GC2221@email>
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: RRSMSX606.amr.corp.intel.com
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ironport-av: E=Sophos;i="4.62,219,1297065600"; d="scan'208";a="833931283"
x-ironport-anti-spam-filtered: true
x-ironport-anti-spam-result:
Al8BAE0MZk1GKvFukWdsb2JhbACmPwEBAgkLCgcRBCC9dYVgBIUQhXc
x-virus-scanned: by bsmtpd at xensource.com
x-beenthere: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
x-mailman-version: 2.1.5
list-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
list-post: <mailto:xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
errors-to: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
x-asg-debug-id: 1298562494-6d03170e0001-8pertM
x-barracuda-envelope-from: konrad@xxxxxxxxxxxx
x-asg-orig-subj: Re: [Xen-devel] tip of jeremy/xen.git xen/next-2.6.38 fails
to compile
x-barracuda-connect: rcsinet10.oracle.com[148.87.113.121]
x-barracuda-start-time: 1298562494
x-barracuda-url: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
user-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
x-barracuda-spam-score: 0.00
x-barracuda-spam-status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of
TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0
tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
x-source-ip: acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]
x-ct-refid: str=0001.0A090206.4D667DB9.0070:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0
x-auth-type: Internal IP
x-barracuda-spam-report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.56272 Rule
breakdown below pts rule name description ----
----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.00 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable
relay lines
x-barracuda-encrypted: AES256-SHA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 01:00:56PM +0100, Rafal Wojtczuk wrote:
> > Hello,
> > it looks like some patches are missing in the current xen/next-2.6.38. E.g.
> > IRQF_FORCE_RESUME is used but not defined.
>
> Brave soul :-)
>
> For right now take my tree:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git devel/next-2.6.38
>
> It has the dom0 + lots of patches (including the pciback and netback).
>
> No blkback yet.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home