WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] xl block-attach

To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach
From: Kamala Narasimhan <kamala.narasimhan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:56:07 -0500
Delivery-date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:57:19 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YpJ/PfyjVtThNsZzn7TFETZiKfXGf7aDuoAFpIvcqdA=; b=oqXco7PxPA3ImWA7tAvF7MlHxPGD9h9Wpzx55OpmCtRDKNpJajoRHcT4C5CrTcbyss 7aJ0ZgwKUa0GJf4rCnUCwkqatWPGjLxLbjzt79sUaoTIF5NVeNm01u+07dvfNoh23+A+ pnS0w8YJl/9mKD0Bf7Ojl6//imV1BoHnDhxXU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Q763IuSIfC/ePSz+LpKbSiEa+oOmJT4MmnawUjSA1CrzatqsY6pEm9bf1OptaB+OFL m/ya8bkKFLAigfXQoJXMX/MvgsInIphilm5sqzxFOy6CvO84ijjWKC1xrYbgfTHFWEHl jZKR/reybaGvaWApEe1tbSLTu4aWdcjzybQAg=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
The format in which disk information is required in xl block-attach is different
than the one expected in the disk configuration option (in the config file).  It
might make sense to keep the two consistent (excluding the domain/backend dom id
additional param block-attach would require).  Would it be alright if I enforce
it in our implementation (in main_blockattach in xl_cmdimpl.c) and modify
block-attach help to reflect that change?

Kamala

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>