WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/13] Nested Virtualization: Overview

To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/13] Nested Virtualization: Overview
From: Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:20:40 -0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:21:33 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YAU3+PFcU/ePDWFskzDK/fRxYAhgM/kTA9WD+0nj0CI=; b=QFYMBthuHsCbl+r8QMkfGGiuapOzFq8syNdhZi01ly+obPk3eJNv3iFbxhJQGcxfA3 F0YoPN+LMSTbpbwL6ulqwMWIsrrDnlliM5PI0hYSoTLNBQWuIPcC8lOG9/mzyaxe0vpC 1eUcyYIS9viV0Y5lSrQb+3ecgHjCDwppOt4PU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=bvYVxJQh8VQQTEzOtFk3baPVuiM1bZ6h02XnM3TyzJNc05LWx1DK7AR3l+Th2PcS3w 8MFOSkj8biYO+tcqwI6NJCjkcsKby+/CS/mQFjplzMriVHVsV3HL4U8x9jo9sYN+BxM8 TglnQALFOP/wmsTMidYqt0Zo06/g75d639bsY=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201011121939.17994.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <201011121939.17994.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi!

This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen.
This is the sixth patch series. Improvements to the
previous patch submission:

- Move GIF definition into SVM
- Move VMEXIT emulation into SVM
- Introduce hooks for getting host/guest cr3 for use with hap-on-hap
  per proposal from Eddie Dong
- Moved fields from struct nestedhvm into SVM
- Renamed struct nestedhvm to struct nestedvcpu
- Reworked VMRUN and VMEXIT emulation. It uses a defered emulation
  mechanism that makes interrupt handling more efficient and is closer
  to what VMX is doing
- VMCB is peristent mapped. Only remap the VMCB when l1 guest
  changes the address.


The patch series:

patch 01: add nestedhvm guest config option to the tools.
                 This is the only one patch touching the tools
patch 02: Add data structures for nested virtualization.
patch 03: add nestedhvm function hooks.
patch 04: The heart of nested virtualization.
patch 05: Allow switch to paged real mode during vmrun emulation.
                 Emulate cr0 and cr4 when guest does not intercept them
                 (i.e. Hyper-V/Windows7, KVM)
patch 06: When injecting an exception into nested guest, inject
                 #VMEXIT into the guest if intercepted.
patch 07: Allow guest to enable SVM in EFER only on AMD.
patch 08: Handle interrupts (generic part).
patch 09: SVM specific implementation for nested virtualization.
patch 10: Handle interrupts (SVM specific).
patch 11: The piece of code that effectively turns on nested virtualization.
patch 12: Move dirty_vram from struct hvm_domain to struct p2m_domain.
                 This change is the first part from a larger not-yet-ready
                 change where the vram and log_dirty tracking is teached
                 to work on per p2m.
patch 13: Handle nested pagefault to enable hap-on-hap and handle
                 nested guest page-table-walks to emulate instructions
                 the guest does not intercept (i.e. WBINVD with Windows 7).


--
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


I'd like to ask a general question on nested virtualization. Can an L1 or L>1 VM span multiple physical machines?
I'm guessing not from the pdf, http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-04/pdfsVHwQIeZLB.pdf, but I wanted to ask and confirm because if so, this would be a fantastic way to segregate individual customer infrastructures in a cloud environment. 

Thanks

-Bruce

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>