WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] PVops domain 0 crash on NUMA system only Node==1 present

To: Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PVops domain 0 crash on NUMA system only Node==1 present (Was: Re: Bug#603632: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Linux kernel 2.6.32/xen/amd64 booting fine on bare metal, but not as dom0 with Xen 4.0.1 (Dell R410))
From: Vincent Caron <vcaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:49:13 +0100
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Vincent CARON <zerodeux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cris Daniluk <cris.daniluk@xxxxxxxxx>, 603632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir
Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 03:24:19 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1290697298.5514.2686.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Bearstech
References: <20101115233253.11935.35707.reportbug@zerohal> <1290513067.31507.7699.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CEC06C1.5010500@xxxxxxxx> <1290689518.14372.470.camel@zerohal> <1290697298.5514.2686.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:01 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > 
> >   Booting native with the same Xen-enabled kernel gives:
> [...]
> 
> Which looks to be pretty much completely different (this was the exact
> same system and BIOS settings as the original Xen log, right?).
> 
> The diff is below but it's so different as to be nearly unreadable.

  I've just rebooted my Squeeze with and without the hypervisor with no
BIOS tweaking at all to be sure. Enclosed are the full logs for both
cases.


Attachment: bootlog_native.txt
Description: Text document

Attachment: bootlog_xen.txt
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>