WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xennet_get_drvinfo()

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xennet_get_drvinfo()
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:15:22 -0800
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:15:59 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1290680231.5514.2239.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4CDC3003.5040306@xxxxxxxxxx> <1289501456.20667.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CED7792.1090600@xxxxxxxx> <4CED79E4.4030608@xxxxxxxxxx> <4CED7C03.6000803@xxxxxxxx> <1290680231.5514.2239.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6
On 11/25/2010 02:17 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:56 +0000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> The fallback does cover the functionality ("driver: vif"), but
>>> "driver: xen-netfront" seems to be nicer, because that matches the
>>> module (driver) name.
>> Hm.  Well, perhaps we should change the driver name?  We can keep
>> "vif" as an alias. 
> Whatever we do we shouldn't deliberately cause the xen.git 2.6.32 branch
> to deviate from what upstream does, if we think this field needs
> renaming lets do it on linux-netdev and backport the result.

Yes, exactly.  I backported Ben's change so that .32 would be more like
later kernels; if the device name is useless (which it is), then we
should change it everywhere.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>