On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 12:59 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 12:55 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
> > > > > Stefano, is there this branch tested for live migration issues? For
> > > > > example, if i compile kernel with config, that working on
> > > > > stable-2.6.32.x does it work on pvhvm branch?
> > > >
> > > > PV on HVM should work on stable-2.6.32.x but I received a bug
> > > > report on live migration issues precisely on that kernel, so if it
> > > > doesn't work for you I wouldn't be surprised.
> > > >
> > > > Alternatively I suggest you keep using 2.6.36-rc6-pvhvm-v8.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ok. I'm try to use pvhvm and deeper testing it. Does pvhvm branch pull
> > > changes from stable-2.6.32.x ?
> >
> > it is the other way around: stable-2.6.32.x pulls changes from the pvhvm
> > branch, so you should just use stable-2.6.32.x
>
> Hmm. Ok this means, that a can use stable-2.6.32.x and get second serial
> console support in domU ?
I see what you mean now.
stable-2.6.32.x does not support multiple PV serials but the pvhvm
branch does.
So you have to use the pvhvm branch on Jeremy's tree or
2.6.36-rc6-pvhvm-v8 on my tree.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home