>> I'm worried about stability, changes in behaviour, changes in kernel /
>> parameters, problems with compiling some orig xen kernel, problems running
>
>All of those, except stability, are issues you are going to encounter with
>a new kernel...
>
>Can you be more specific about the stability? Have you seen it crash?
I think i had some issues seen during testing (core or even kernel error
messages), also i saw a cpu panic (twice i think) which isn't reproducable
(immediate reboot that worked afterwards).
And i would have choosed the "old" kernel, but it didn't work on my Intel
Standard System (not really new as Q35/Core2Duo is about 2 years old) whereas i
think 2.6.18 should run without problems on that hardware. I did a lot of tests
/ configurations with compiling on different distros (debian squeeze and lenny,
fc14, OpenSuse) with different kernel versions (also updated xen kernel sources
during compilation sometimes which ends up in different results during
compilation) and saw an inhomogone picture of xen 4 / kernels in total, so that
is why i say "does not fit for a prod system now". I am missing a reproducable,
homogene behaviour of xen / kernels and packages like it was with 3.x.
Unfortunately i don't have any logs because i only tested the new xen 4
features to
verify the xen wiki docu and features to be able to get a big picture of the
actual xen 4 status. I am not really happy with the result: xen 4.0.1 with
pvops kernel works mostly with standard features, missing some things like
pvusb. 2.6.18 kernel didn't compile or run's only with also seen kernel errors
(4.0.2-rc1-pre) on my testsystem. Additional having video problems (agpart)
with standard drivers - actually only squeeze runs with X11 without errors.
Actually Squeeze gets the best xen 4 results with xen pakages available :-)
FC14 is missing a dom0 kernel package, so the plain xen 4 RPM isn't really a
succes story yet... when this (dom0 kernel pakage) comes, we can say "XEN is
back" again (if xen 4 is stable and homogene in behaviour as 3.4.2 was).
>> 2.6.18 kernel like above, dependencies like pvops version .32 for > 4.0.1,
>> .31 for < 4.0.1, bugs in 4.0.0, less bugs in 4.0.1, missing features like
>
>PVUSB.. well we would love if somebody volunteered to do the driver.
Yes, me too ;-)
>
>> pvusb, windows in vhd didn't like the GPLPV drivers (blue screen), signed
>
>Uhh, no idea. I am actually using the Novell GPL drivers in Windows 2000
>and they seem to work fine.
i am using GPLPV without issues with phy:LVM devices (XP and Win7)
>
>> Citrix PV drivers only work with version 5.5, not 5.6, pvops kernel works on
>> my hardware with debian pvops xen 4.0.1 kernel, but xen pvops kernel
>> compiled according to wiki fc13 page has errors with agpart loading and so
>> on..... so i'm waiting for 4.0.3 ;-)
>
>Hm, the agpart loading I thought was fixed. When did you observe this behavior?
This is actual a problem with 4.0.1 (stable tree) on fc14. squeeze is working
well at this time. Didn't verify 4.0.2-rc1 yet with X11 - i had to clean all
the testing chaos on my discs in order not to mix up different things (which
might happened though) ;-)
regards
neobiker
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home