On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
> >> a copy
> >> + * of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
> >> to deal
> >> + * in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
> >> rights
> >> + * to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
> >> sell
> >> + * copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
> >> + * furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> >> + *
> >> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> >> included in
> >> + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> >> + *
> >> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> >> EXPRESS OR
> >> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
> >> MERCHANTABILITY,
> >> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
> >> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
> >> OTHER
> >> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
> >> ARISING FROM,
> >> + * OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
> >> IN
> >> + * THE SOFTWARE.
> >
> > So all this code has always been public domain? There are no GPL'ed pieces
> > in there?
>
> Public domain is something entirely different. This is just a permissive
> license, and it's used a lot throughout qemu. So as you state that this
> file is mostly a copy of pc.c which uses this license, at least for the
> copied part it's not only okay, but even required to use the same
> license here.
Indeed, the license above is BSD because the original was BSD, it would
be rude to GPL it.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home