Ahh i see that patch contains the patches i mentioned already.
Sunday, November 14, 2010, 6:47:25 PM, you wrote:
> This is not exactly git8 . Michael Young applied attached patch on top of
> git8.
> It's his the most recent submission to fedora-xen.
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2598434
> Boris.
> --- On Sun, 11/14/10, Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.37-rc1 mainline domU - BUG: unable to handle
> kernel paging request
> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bruce Edge" <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jeremy
> Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sunday, November 14, 2010, 12:19 PM
> Perhaps these patches (especially Stefano's) could make a difference ?
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1011.1/02348.html
> I don't think these are applied to your domU kernel since it's git8, it
> worth the shot i guess...
> --
> Sander
> Sunday, November 14, 2010, 6:09:14 PM, you wrote:
>>> Hmmm have you tried do do a lot of I/O with something else as NFS ?
>> I've tried scp a lot from DomU to Dom0 on F14 no problems, on Ubuntu 10.04
>> Server
>> DomU as NFS client cannot survive more then a 2-3 min with I/O generated by
>> scp.
>> If i unmount NFS share everything goes fine ( Ubuntu 10.04)
>>> That would perhaps pinpoint it to NFS doing something not completely
>>> compatible with
>> Xen.
>> If DomU ( Ubuntu 10.04 ) is running by 2.6.36 kernel there is no any NFS or
>> other network related problems . Issue is specific for 2.6.37-rc1 kernel as
>> kernel running DomU at Xen 4.0.1 Dom0 ( 2.6.32.25 pvops) on top of Ubuntu
>> Lucid Server.
>> Boris.
>> -- On Sun, 11/14/10, Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.37-rc1 mainline domU - BUG: unable to
>> handle kernel paging request
>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>> xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bruce Edge" <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jeremy
>> Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sunday, November 14, 2010, 11:56 AM
>> Hmmm have you tried do do a lot of I/O with something else as NFS ?
>> That would perhaps pinpoint it to NFS doing something not completely
>> compatible with Xen.
>> I'm not using NFS (I still use file: based guests, and i use glusterfs (fuse
>> based userspace cluster fs) to share diskspace to domU's via ethernet).
>> I tried NFS in the past, but had some troubles setting it up, and even more
>> problems with disconnects.
>> I haven't seen any "unable to handle page request" problems with my mix of
>> guest kernels, which includes some 2.6.37-rc1 kernels.
>> --
>> Sander
>> Sunday, November 14, 2010, 5:37:59 PM, you wrote:
>>> I've tested F14 DomU (kernel
>>> vmlinuz-2.6.37-0.1.rc1.git8.xendom0.fc14.x86_64) as NFS client and Xen
>>> 4.0.1 F14 Dom0 (kernel vmlinuz-2.6.32.25-172.xendom0.fc14.x86_64) as NFS
>>> server . Copied 700 MB ISO images from NFS folder at Dom0 to DomU and
>>> scp'ed them back to Dom0. During about 30 - 40 min DomU ran pretty stable ,
>>> regardless kernel crash as "unable to handle page request" was reported
>>> once by F14 DomU, but it didn't actually crash DomU. Same excersises with
>>> replacement F14 by Ubuntu 10.04 Server results DomU crash in about several
>>> minutes. Dom0's instances dual boot on same development box ( Q9500,ASUS
>>> P5Q3,8GB)
>>> Boris.
>>> --- On Fri, 11/12/10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.37-rc1 mainline domU - BUG: unable to
>>> handle kernel paging request
>>> To: "Sander Eikelenboom" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>,
>>> xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bruce Edge" <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jeremy
>>> Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Friday, November 12, 2010, 12:01 PM
>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:27:43PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps handpick some kernels before and after the pulls of the xen
>>>> patches (pv-on-hvm etc) to begin with ?
>>>> When you let git choose, especially with rc-1 kernels, you will end up
>>>> with kernels in between patch series, resulting in panics.
>>> Well, just the bare-bone boot of PV guests with nothing fancy ought to work.
>>> But that is the theory and ..
>>>> > The git bisecting is slow going. I've never tried that before and I'm a
>>>> > git
>>>> > rookie.
>>>> > I picked 2.6.36 - 2.6.37-rc1 as the bisect range and my first 2 bisects
>>>> > all
>>>> > panic at boot so I'm obviously doing something wrong.
>>>> > I'll RTFM a bit more and keep at it.
>>> .. as Bruce experiences this is not the case. Hmm..
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>
--
Best regards,
Sander mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home