Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.37-rc1 mainline domU - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request

[Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>]

Bruce,

I just tried 2.6.36 + patch-2.6.36-git13 via patch-2.6.36-git13.bz2 ( i picked it up from MY's first kernel-2.6.37.fc15.rc0.git13.src.rpm ). Kernel 2.6.36-git13 already has a BUG .
So , problem is inside 11 MB   patch-2.6.36-git13.bz2 . Might be it gives 37-rc1,
i am not sure. If you want , i can try to send it to you.

Boris.
P.S. Bisecting 36 - 37-rc1 is too much anyway.

--- On Fri, 11/12/10, Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.37-rc1 mainline domU - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, November 12, 2010, 9:40 AM

The git bisecting is slow going. I've never tried that before and I'm a git rookie.
I picked 2.6.36 - 2.6.37-rc1 as the bisect range and my first 2 bisects all panic at boot so I'm obviously doing something wrong.
I'll RTFM a bit more and keep at it.

-Bruce

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ubuntu's  10.10  2.6.35-22-generic (or server)  works fine for PV DomUs sharing
same image device. I never tested  vanilla 2.6.35 (36) itself for PV DomU support.

Boris.

--- On Thu, 11/11/10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.37-rc1 mainline domU - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bruce Edge" <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 11:46 AM

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:29:38AM -0800, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> > Boris, what version of Linux kernel worked for you as PV DomU? 2.6.36? 2.6.35?
>
> Konrad,
>
> The version is 2.6.37-rc1,  been built from upstream source.

I know that. I was asking what version worked for you in the past. As in, did you do
the same tests with older kernels (2.6.36 for example?)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel