|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vif-common.sh prevent physdev match: using --phy
Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 5:53:19 PM, you wrote:
> Sander Eikelenboom writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] vif-common.sh prevent physdev
> match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for
> non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore"):
>> - iptables "$c" FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-in "$vif" "$@" -j ACCEPT \
>> + iptables "$c" FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged --physdev-in "$vif"
>> "$@" -j ACCEPT \
> This will break on earlier iptables and/or earlier kernels.
> Is there a way to detect whether --physdev-is-bridged is going to work ?
> We could grep the output from iptables but is that sufficient ? I
> guess we may need to check for kernel behaviour too somehow.
Good point, although I don't have a config with an old enough iptables/kernel
to test what happens in that case ..
The option should be available from before 2008
(http://ipset.netfilter.org/iptables.man.html) though.
> Ian.
--
Best regards,
Sander mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|