xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up
>>> On 14.09.10 at 00:51, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I guess there are three options:
>
> 1. add a "xen_maxmem" (or something) kernel parameter to override
> space specified in the E820 table
Isn't that what the (native) "mem=" option is intended for?
> 2. ignore E820 if its a privileged domain
I think this upper limit specified by the machine E820 should be
ignored here, and an option (as per 1.) should be available.
> 3. only allow extra memory up to a certain ratio of the base memory
> (8x? 16x? 32x?)
Enforcing a sane upper limit of the ratio (we use 32x currently)
seems like a reasonable thing to do in any case.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Ballooning up, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up,
Jan Beulich <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Ballooning up, Ian Campbell
|
|
|