Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem (tools-side): ABI v1 to handle long

Dan Magenheimer writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem (tools-side): ABI v1 to 
handle long object-ids (XEN-UNSTABLE)"):
> tmem (tools-side): move to new ABI version to handle
> long object-ids

Thanks for this patch.

I'm sad to say that this appears to confirm that the decision by the
world in general not to use tmem yet was correct.  After all if they
_were_ using it now they'd have some pain.

I don't have a strong opinion about this patch.  The tools part seems
reasonably well-contained so I guess I'm happy to see it applied.

> Please apply to XEN-UNSTABLE ... see separate post for
> the essentially identical xen-4.0-testing equivalent.

It would probably be best if Keir applied both patches in a single
changeset, to avoid build breakage.

It would be easier to find your messages if your patchbomb script (or
your mailer, if you're doing it by hand) could be persuaded to post
all the portions of a series in a single thread, with appropriate
In-Reply-To and References headers.

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] RE: xen-4.0-testing ioemu-dir build fails with kvm.c(?!) errors, Ian Jackson

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: do not return to caller from monitoring daemon, Ian Jackson

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem (tools-side): ABI v1 to handle long object-ids (XEN-UNSTABLE), Dan Magenheimer

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem (tools-side): ABI v1 to handle long object-ids (XEN-UNSTABLE), Dan Magenheimer

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]