Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Disallow setting maxmem to higher value

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 22:10 +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> > It's not only in xenstore, it is also in the result of the
> > XENMEM_get_memory_map hypercall.
> 
> Is that separate from 3?

As far as the h/v is concerned yes. Although they know it's an e820 the
set/get_memory_map hypercalls basically store an opaque blob so far as
the h/v is concerned. xend doesn't seem so sure they are unrelated...

> > Old-style PV Linux domains really do use static-max in this way. It may
> > well be that there are potentially better ways for guests to implement
> > this in the future but we have a deployed base of guests which work this
> > way.
> 
> I specifically meant the Xenstore "static-max" value is useless. 
> Getting it via hypercall is fine.

I'm not sure but I think this is used by HVM balloon drivers when PoD is
active. I don't know why this is the case though, other than
XENMEM_get_memory_map being a PV only hypercall.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] [IA64] Rename irq_cfg->domain to irq_cfg->cpu_mask, KUWAMURA Shin'ya

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] reserve vtd_mem on guest restore, Miroslav Rezanina

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Disallow setting maxmem to higher value than total physical memory size, Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH, v4]: xl: randomly generate UUID's, Christoph Egger

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Disallow setting maxmem to higher value than tot