WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix bootloader handling when empty string is bei

To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix bootloader handling when empty string is being output
From: Michal Novotny <minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:12:26 +0200
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:12:57 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4C7CD9E2.2070804@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4C7BADAA.9080209@xxxxxxxxxx> <1283244457.12544.9283.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C7CC85A.8070803@xxxxxxxxxx> <4C7CD2D2.9010305@xxxxxxxxxx> <1283249417.12544.9367.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C7CD6FC.2000503@xxxxxxxxxx> <4C7CD9E2.2070804@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4
On 08/31/2010 12:30 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 08/31/2010 12:18 PM, Michal Novotny wrote:
Isn't it possible this is
somehow connected to the PTY patch ? How should the PTY c/s 13540 ?

This one has been there since Xen 3.1, and it's, ehm, unlikely that it broke that much time ago. :)

Oh, maybe but in fact I don't know what version I used it last time to use syntax like `xm create -c PVguest`.


Isn't it hypervisor/kernel related that it requires some data that
are not coming from there?

Huh???

Oh, nevermind if it's been there since Xen 3.1.

Michal

--
Michal Novotny<minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>, RHCE
Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel