WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] gdbsx defines own _domctl_hcall instead of using libxc?

To: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] gdbsx defines own _domctl_hcall instead of using libxc?
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:48:36 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:49:42 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Mukesh,

I was auditing uses of set_xen_guest_handle for correctness when I
noticed that gdbsx (specifically tools/debugger/gdbsx/xg/xg_main.c)
defines its own _domctl_hcall and associated helpers instead of using
libxc.

Is there any particular reason for that?

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>