[Xen-devel] xen_hvm_callback_vector

To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] xen_hvm_callback_vector
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:57:07 -0700
Cc:	"Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:58:02 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100806 Fedora/3.1.2-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.2

 Should entry_64.S's xen_hvm_callback_vector be calling
xen_evtchn_do_upcall or xen_hvm_evtchn_do_upcall?  If not the hvm
version, when does that get used?

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT] Sync pvhvm changes in 2.6.36-rc1 into xen/2.6.32.x, Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] Fix lost interrupt race in Xen event channels, Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] new to Xen Development, James Bond

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Re: xen_hvm_callback_vector, Ian Campbell

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] xen_hvm_callback_vector