| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Network buffering of remus
|
To: |
Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxx>, geoffrey@xxxxxxxxx, dmeyer@xxxxxxxxx, feeley@xxxxxxxxx, norm@xxxxxxxxx, andy@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Network buffering of remus |
|
From: |
Frank Pan <frankpzh@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:35:51 +0800 |
|
Cc: |
|
|
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:37:04 -0700 |
|
Dkim-signature: |
v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=AF3NufxbKs15E8Qy/eGZJd/+soIIU3FoFBmhSTV2lZk=; b=nlBt9D0wWaXaQEtgKjjo4YygxnsrMlhvYzmccFdOn2lh7+Y/FJZZ5A3CXCnT5RR+zZ dC1osjirvmAO34Rde0/4KrksxYPkwvIggw13JUWq1VK4Wu04p4MGUpLWdGpuEPzfV7d8 sgfWvtkfRNiAYJ/C1o8ecXViNjWwvMl0JUHaA= |
|
Domainkey-signature: |
a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=T4rq3g0jS3LAdTUPwxSj9OM8R8JHHaFMehkAGnaag3e78IVTlcvN9jggZ4MyxaMTSX 20R5NXpMCcPHc18kVMcxJjNenbhs0bKIHsPzl2/WRtxmgs5+2ltKNTWceuge279g3GHB J1jbEQf+Ba2yLZf/s7ZkxwBQ/4slRAPR/NEUU= |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<20100823163928.GC4470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<AANLkTik49ncUKa9W0nRLN_qNFhmbgPXhNuNYQJbjeUpU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100823163928.GC4470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You'll probably want to test with something a bit more systematic than
> ping. If ping sends a packet to the protected machine just before the
> end of an epoch, the response won't be buffered very long at all. On
> the other hand, if ping sends its packet at the start of an epoch, the
> response will be delayed for the entire epoch length. By default, ping
> sends packets infrequently, and the delay between pings isn't
> particularly rigid, so you'll get jumpy results with it.
>
Thanks for reply.
After some debugging I found the buffering is not working. I use an
hvm guest with qemu-simulated NIC, the active interface is tapX.0, not
vifX.0.
I've modified remus code, replace "vif%d.0" with "tap%d.0", but it
does not work. Do you know how to make it working?
I also tried pv NIC on hvm, but it seems remus does not support
"PV-on-HVM" guest. Is it hard to do, if I want to add this feature?
Can you give me some advices?
Thanks.
--
Frank Pan
Computer Science and Technology
Tsinghua University
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home