|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] BSS region in xen_in_range is incorrect
It works for me. Thanks.
Regards,
Weidong
-----Original Message-----
From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 12:45 AM
To: Han, Weidong; Jan Beulich
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] BSS region in xen_in_range is incorrect
I've fixed this as xen-unstable:21225.
-- Keir
On 22/04/2010 11:57, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Allocate the static buffer in initdata, and always require to dynamically
> allocate a replacement buffer during Xen boot. The latter allocation should
> surely succeed since it happens so early.
>
> Goodness knows why I applied that patch so late during 4.0.0 release cycle.
>
> -- Keir
>
> On 22/04/2010 10:35, "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> In c/s 21038, console_init_postirq frees default static ring buffer if a
>> dynamic one was obtained. This makes dom0 can use the default static ring
>> buffer which is in BSS region, but xen_in_range didn't remove the region from
>> BSS region which won't be mapped in VT-d page table, so it causes problems
>> when a device DMAs to that region. To fix this issue, 1) remove the freed
>> region from BSS region in xen_in_range; 2) don't free default static ring
>> buffer. Method 1) can fix it cleanly, but maybe need many changes. Method 2)
>> is simple, but it wastes some resources.
>>
>> Keir / Jan, what's your opinion?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Weidong
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|