WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch] continue_hypercall_on_cpu rework using tasklets

from [Wei, Gang] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch] continue_hypercall_on_cpu rework using tasklets
From: "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:10:01 +0800
Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
Acceptlanguage: zh-CN, en-US
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:10:55 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C7F361E5.11E3B%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <F26D193E20BBDC42A43B611D1BDEDE710270AE3CBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C7F361E5.11E3B%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcrccV74GaC9GZ9lTbWk9MTZP2+EwQAAhsPFAABQK/sAAk0GUAADclFDAACQZU4ALZt/IAASROMCAIgpZXUAJs+pcAAPtTZEAAKPgbA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [Patch] continue_hypercall_on_cpu rework using tasklets 
On Tuesday, 2010-4-20 8:52 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> How reliable is S3 in 4.0, for comparison? Did you get it rock solid?

S3 in 4.0 just pass several 100-time S3 stress test. It is not that rock solid. 
So I am not sure whether it is a regression or not yet.

> Also, try c/s 21204 before getting into heavy debugging. It fixes
> being able to access VMCS fields from c_h_o_c() context. Worth a try.

I will give 21204 a try.

Jimmy
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Wei, Gang
Next by Date:  [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] CPUIDLE: shorten hpet spin_lock holding time, Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] continue_hypercall_on_cpu rework using tasklets, Keir Fraser
Next by Thread:  RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch] continue_hypercall_on_cpu rework using tasklets, Wei, Gang
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy