WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] pci-passthrough not working on 4.0.1-rc1-pre: mm.c:3847:

To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pci-passthrough not working on 4.0.1-rc1-pre: mm.c:3847:d10 Bad page 00000000001beab4: ed=ffff830151210000(10), sd=ffff830151210000, caf=8000000000000002, taf=7400000000000001
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:28:39 -0400
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:30:17 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1934472801.20100419192319@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <954516187.20100416170742@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100419141950.GA18513@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1497488369.20100419164714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100419155936.GA11619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <103758397.20100419181342@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100419162736.GA9988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1144401458.20100419190923@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1934472801.20100419192319@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 07:23:19PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> Think i have found it, these domains where running old debian 2.6.26 kernels, 
> based on 2.6.18.
> Perhaps something recently on pciback has broken compatibility with that ?

I tested it at some point with SLES10 (which is XenLinux based), but I
haven't done the testing recently. Let me try that and see if there was
something new that got introduced.

You did of course use 'iommu=soft' in the guest?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>