| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] future plans for libxl?
Andre Przywara writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] future plans for libxl?"):
> I have a working version of xl info ready.
Great!
> I have still to think about the best approach for some fields to
> propagate in libxl_get_version_info and libxl_get_physinfo (bitfields
> vs. strings). I am not sure what the casual library user would like
> more: Masking bits or strstr'ing for names? For reporting (as in xl
> info) compiled strings are easier.
> Any suggestions? (I especially think about xen_caps, virt_caps and
> xen_scheduler)
I think the C interface, that is, the interface to libxl, should be
in terms of bitfields. xl should do conversion to strings.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home