WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen

from [Jeremy Fitzhardinge] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:30:42 -0700
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:31:32 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003171100310.23661@kaball-desktop>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003101457100.28412@kaball-desktop> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003161834570.23661@kaball-desktop> <201003171651.05220.sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201003171718.37598.sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003171100310.23661@kaball-desktop>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3 
On 03/17/2010 08:17 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:

Finally I would still like the call to xen_guest_init to be moved
afterwards: if we move it after kvm_guest_init we can be pretty sure
that upstream is going to accept it. Besides ACPI is currently working
with your patch series applied, when and if we break ACPI we'll worry
about it.

Why/how does ACPI get broken?  I think that's something we should 
definitely avoid doing.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
















[More with this subject...]










<Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread>




















Previous by Date: 
Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk




Next by Date: 
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] pvops dom0 kernel: Unable to locate 	IOAPIC for GSI 2 and 9, kishore kumar




Previous by Thread: 
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge




Next by Thread: 
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge




Indexes: 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists]











   
  

  

     
   
  









  
Copyright
       2005-2025, Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. 
   Legal and Privacy