|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
On 03/16/2010 04:07 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
OK, you are right: having an explicit "set/remove tsc offset" is
the best solution.
I wonder if we should include scale in that API, since I think future
CPUs will allow that to be set too. (If its not supported, then the
call will fail if the scale is anything other than 1.)
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Frank van der Linden
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Sheng Yang
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Sheng Yang
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Sheng Yang
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen, Sheng Yang
|
|
|
|
|